Mark Anthony Glass v. James H. Gomez, Director Charles D. Marshall, Warden Attorney General of California

17 F.3d 394 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mark Anthony GLASS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James H. GOMEZ, Director; Charles D. Marshall, Warden; Attorney General of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-56438. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 20, 1993. * Decided Jan. 7, 1994. Before: SNEED, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Mark Anthony Glass, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 petition for habeas corpus. Glass contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at his trial for first-degree murder, robbery, and possession of a shotgun. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 , and review de novo. Thomas v. Lewis, 945 F.2d 1119, 1122 (9th Cir.1991). We affirm. 3 To show ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must demonstrate that his counsel's performance was deficient, and that the deficient performance prejudiced his…