Robert J. Ferrari v. United States Parole Commission

Good Law
17 F.3d 394·1994 WL 43205·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 9301
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 199493-15497California452 words

Opinion

Opinion

17 F.3d 394 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert J. FERRARI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-15497. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 7, 1994. * Decided Feb. 11, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert Ferrari, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 petition for habeas corpus for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, Thomas v. Brewer, 923 F.2d 1361, 1364 (9th Cir.1991), and affirm. 3 In 1977, Ferrari was convicted of bank robbery, sentenced to a fifteen-year federal prison term. Ferrari was released on parole in 1983. While on parole, he was convicted of burglary, and sentenced to a six-year state prison term. Pursuant to a parole revocation hearing, the Parole Commission revoked Ferrari's parole,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.