William S. Lund v. Donald H. Albrecht, and Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland Robert A. Olson Irving H. Greines

Good Law
17 F.3d 395·1994 WL 48322·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 9248
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 199492-55977California406 words

Opinion

Opinion

17 F.3d 395 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William S. LUND, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald H. ALBRECHT, Defendant and Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland; Robert A. Olson; Irving H. Greines, Appellants. No. 92-55977. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 3, 1994. * Decided Feb. 17, 1994. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Central District of California, D.C. No. CV-86-0763-RSWL; Ronald S.W. Lew, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. REVERSED. Before: BROWNING, FERGUSON, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 This is an appeal from the district court's order sanctioning Robert Olson, attorney for the appellants, for failure to appear at a status conference. Olson contends that the court lacked jurisdiction to sanction conduct that occurred after a satisfaction of judgment was filed in the case. He also argues that he could not be sanctioned without a finding of gross negligence, reckless disregard of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.