Shelley Jean Pumphrey v. City of Coeur D'alene, a Municipal Corporation City of Coeur D'Alene Police Department

Good Law
17 F.3d 395·1994 WL 55541·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 9255
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 24, 199492-36748California876 words

Opinion

Opinion

17 F.3d 395 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Shelley Jean PUMPHREY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF COEUR D'ALENE, a municipal corporation; City of Coeur D'Alene Police Department, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-36748. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 31, 1994. Decided Feb. 24, 1994. Before: GOODWIN, SCHROEDER, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Shelley Pumphrey appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of Coeur d'Alene on her Title VII and Sec. 1983 claims. She raises both disparate treatment and disparate impact theories, arguing that she was discriminated against on the basis of her gender in connection with her termination as a police officer. 3 The district court correctly ordered summary judgment on Pumphrey's claims of disparate treatment. Although Pumphrey asserts that her training was inadequate, the record reflects that the field training and firearm training offered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.