Phyllis G. Kyle v. Campbell Soup Company

Good Law
17 F.3d 395·1994 WL 5756·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 9227
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 7, 199492-16125California2,162 words

Opinion

Opinion

17 F.3d 395 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Phyllis G. KYLE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-16125. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 5, 1993. Decided Jan. 7, 1994. Before: ALARCON, LEAVY and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Campbell Soup Company appeals from the judgment awarding Phyllis Kyle damages in the amount of $5,000.00 resulting from violations of 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, Cal.Gov't Code Sec. 12900, and a permanent injunction prohibiting Campbell Soup from discriminating against Kyle on the basis of her gender with respect to the terms and conditions of her employment, job assignments, shift assignments, training availability, and advancement. Campbell Soup contends that the district court erred (1) in finding that Kyle had proven intentional sex discrimination, (2) in finding that Campbell Soup did not prove…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.