Long v. Healy

Good Law
17 F.3d 395·1994 WL 43187·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 9246
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 199493-35784California734 words

Opinion

Opinion

17 F.3d 395 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael E. LONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James P. HEALY, Judge, Pierce County Superior Court; Chris Quin-Brintnall, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney; John Ladenburg, Prosecuting Attorney; Donald Meath, Court Commissioner, Court of Appeals, Division Two, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35784. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 7, 1994. * Decided Feb. 11, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Washington state prisoner Michael E. Long appeals pro se the district court's judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Long seeks to force the defendants to provide him with a record of his 1972 conviction and an order overturning his 1972 state court conviction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 "[H]abeas [corpus proceedings] must be the exclusive federal remedy not just when a state prisoner requests the invalidation or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.