Mark Larue v. Ken Jurgenson Philip Hobson Carl Frank, Sgt. Sharon Neel

17 F.3d 395 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mark LARUE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ken JURGENSON; Philip Hobson; Carl Frank, Sgt.; Sharon Neel, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35175. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 20, 1993. * Decided Jan. 7, 1994. Before: SNEED, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Mark LaRue, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 civil rights action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim de novo, Woodrum v. Woodard County, Okl., 866 F.2d 1121 , 1124 (9th Cir.1989), and its dismissal as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d) for an abuse of discretion, Denton v. Hernandez, 112 S.Ct. 1728, 1734 (1992). We affirm. 3 LaRue's mother mailed a money order to another inmate. Consequently,…