United States v. Antonio Delgado

17 F.3d 396 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio DELGADO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50148. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 7, 1994. * Decided Feb. 14, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Antonio Delgado appeals his conviction and 204-month sentence following jury trial for possession with intent to distribute and conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1), 846. 3 Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Delgado's counsel submitted a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review. 1 Counsel also filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review. 4 The motion of counsel to withdraw is GRANTED and the judgment is AFFIRMED.…