Carl Dean Swift and David Raymond Gren v. Samuel A. Lewis, Director, Carl Dean Swift, and David Raymond Gren v. Samuel A. Lewis, Director

17 F.3d 396 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Carl Dean SWIFT Plaintiff, and David Raymond Gren, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel A. LEWIS, Director, et al., Defendant-Appellee. Carl Dean SWIFT, Plaintiff-Appellant, and David Raymond Gren, Plaintiff, v. Samuel A. LEWIS, Director, et al., Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 92-15561, 92-15565. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 9, 1993. Decided Dec. 10, 1993. Before: KOZINSKI, THOMPSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arizona state prisoners Carl D. Swift and David R. Gren ("the prisoners") appeal the district court's summary judgment in favor of Arizona Department of Corrections (ADOC) officials in the prisoners' 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 actions alleging the prison officials violated their civil rights by denying them religious exemptions from prison hair-grooming policies. 3 We have jurisdiction over these timely appeals under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 1 FACTUAL AND…