Harold Shamburger v. T. Rosario, Lieutenant, California Correctional Facility

Good Law
17 F.3d 396·1994 WL 43194·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 9645
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 199493-16080California671 words

Opinion

Opinion

17 F.3d 396 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Harold SHAMBURGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. T. ROSARIO, Lieutenant, California Correctional Facility, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-16080. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 7, 1994. * Decided Feb. 11, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Harold Shamburger appeals pro se the district court's order denying his request for a preliminary injunction. Shamburger sought an injunction ordering the return of materials allegedly confiscated by prison officials on 25 January 1991, and 3 July 1992. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 . We affirm. 3 A district court's order regarding preliminary injunctive relief is subject to limited review. Senate of California v. Mosbacher, 968 F.2d 974, 975 (9th Cir.1992). The grant or denial of a preliminary injunction will be reversed only where the district court abused its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.