United States v. Angel Meza Aispuro, United States of America v. Jorge Figueroa, United States of America v. Jose Manuel Montero, United States of America v. Candelario Beltran Meza

17 F.3d 396 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angel Meza AISPURO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jorge FIGUEROA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Manuel MONTERO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Candelario Beltran MEZA, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-50757, 93-50001, 93-50013 and 93-50064. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 5, 1994. * Decided Feb. 14, 1994. 1 Before: GOODWIN and HALL, Circuit Judges, and TANNER, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Defendants Angel Meza Aispuro, Jorge Garcia Figueroa, Jose Manuel Montero and Candelario Beltran Meza appeal the district court's denial of their combined pretrial motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to a telephonic warrant. We affirm. I. Background 4 On October 8, 1991, at approximately 8:00 p.m., Los…