James C. Standlee v. Angelo Daniels, Deputy Warden H. Haley, C/ps Thomas R. Sullivan

17 F.3d 396 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James C. STANDLEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Angelo DANIELS, Deputy Warden; H. Haley, C/PS; Thomas R. Sullivan, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15819. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 7, 1994. * Decided Feb. 11, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arizona state prisoner James C. Standlee appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration of the district court's summary judgment for the defendants. Standlee alleged that his civil rights were violated in connection with the reclassification of his custody status and that he was denied access to the prison law library. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 A motion for reconsideration that is not timely under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) may be treated as a motion for relief from the judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). Gould v. Mutual Life Ins. Co., of…