Max Stone v. Richard Davis James Zellers, and Hospital & Service Employees Union Local 399, an Unincorporated Association Gloria Marigny

17 F.3d 396 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Max STONE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard DAVIS; James Zellers, Defendants-Appellants, and Hospital & Service Employees Union; Local 399, an unincorporated association; Gloria Marigny, Defendants. No. 92-55901. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 3, 1994. * Decided Feb. 10, 1994. Before: SNEED, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Richard Davis and James Zellers appeal the judgment, entered after a jury trial, on Max Stone's claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED). The jury returned general verdicts for Davis and Zellers on Stone's claims for violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA claim), 29 U.S.C. Secs. 621-634 , and violations of the California statutes barring age and religious discrimination, Cal.Gov't Code Secs. 12940-12941. However, the jury returned general verdicts for Stone on his IIED claim against both Davis and…