United States v. Carol Ann Hays, United States of America v. Mark Christopher Meng, United States of America v. Charles H. Meng, Jr., United States of America v. Marcel Jordan

17 F.3d 397 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carol Ann HAYS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark Christopher MENG, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles H. MENG, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcel JORDAN, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 87-5164 and 87-5166 to 87-5168. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 2, 1993. Decided Dec. 10, 1993. 1 Before: BROWNING, BEEZER, and TROTT, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * 3 Mark Meng, Charles Meng, Marcel Jordan and Carol Ann Hays appeal their convictions and Mark Meng, Jordan and Hays appeal their sentences for mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1341 , equity skimming in violation of 12 U.S.C. Sec. 1709-2 and aiding and abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2 . We affirm in part and vacate and remand in part. 4 I.…