United States v. Tony Oluyinka Okuribido

17 F.3d 397 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner-Appellee v. Tony Oluyinka OKURIBIDO, Respondent-Appellant No. 93-55745. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 7, 1994. * Decided Feb. 14, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Tony Okuribido appeals pro se the denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to vacate his 46-month sentence imposed following his conviction for possession of counterfeit securities and implements for making counterfeit securities in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 513 (a) and (b). Okuribido contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 . We review de novo, United States v. Angelone, 894 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1990), and affirm. 3 To establish ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must establish that counsel's performance was deficient and that the deficiency…