United States v. Grady Durell Travis

Good Law
17 F.3d 397·1994 WL 5752·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 9654
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 7, 199492-36995California677 words

Opinion

Opinion

17 F.3d 397 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Grady Durell TRAVIS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-36995. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 20, 1993. * Decided Jan. 7, 1994. Before: SNEED, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Grady Travis, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. Travis was convicted of possession with intent to distribute cocaine and carrying a semiautomatic handgun during the crime, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 . We review de novo, United States v. Angelone, 894 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1990), and affirm. 3 Travis contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney (1) failed to appeal the trial court's denial of the motion to suppress, (2) did not maintain a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.