United States v. Shannon Lynn Grimes, United States of America v. Shannon Lynn Grimes

Good Law
17 F.3d 397·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 9658
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 7, 199493-30176California470 words

Opinion

Opinion

17 F.3d 397 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shannon Lynn GRIMES, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shannon Lynn GRIMES, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-30176, 93-30180. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 20, 1993. * Decided Jan. 7, 1994. Before: SNEED, NOONAN and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In these consolidated cases, Shannon Lynn Grimes appeals her 110-month sentence following a guilty plea to four counts of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a). She contends the district court erred by refusing to depart downward from the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range on the basis of incomplete coercion or duress, pursuant to U.S.S.G. Sec. 5K2.12. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 3 The district court may depart downward from the applicable Guidelines range on the basis of coercion or duress not amounting to a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.