United States v. Alfonso Mejia, Raul Jose Campos-Rozo, United States of America v. Alfonso Mejia

17 F.3d 397 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfonso MEJIA, Defendant, Raul Jose Campos-Rozo, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfonso MEJIA, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-30512, 93-30018. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 5, 1993. * Decided Dec. 10, 1993. 1 Before: GOODWIN and HUG, Circuit Judges, and MCKIBBEN, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Raul Jose Campos-Rozo and Alfonso Mejia were convicted on one count each of interstate transportation in aid of racketeering in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1952 . On appeal, Campos-Rozo and Mejia together advance two distinct arguments for resentencing. Mejia also advances an argument for reversal of his conviction. We find none of these arguments persuasive. A. Application of the Sentencing Guidelines 4 Campos-Rozo and Mejia contend that a 1987 cocaine transaction in Barrow, Alaska in which they were…