No. 92-55887

Good Law
17 F.3d 397
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 1994397California391 words

Opinion

Opinion

17 F.3d 397 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES for the Use and Benefit of Art BROMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF the WEST, a California corporation, and Does 1 through 50, inclusive; San Diego Diamond, a California corporation, Defendants-Appellees. SAN DIEGO DIAMOND, INC., dba Diamond Pacific, a California corporation, Counter-Claimant, v. Art BROMAN, an individual, Counter-Defendant, No. 92-55887. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 7, 1994. * Decided Feb. 17, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Art Broman appeals pro se the district court's judgment following a bench trial in Broman's action for payment under the Miller Act and for breach of contract against San Diego Diamond, Inc. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we dismiss. 3 On appeal, Broman restates the claims raised in his complaint before the district court and challenges the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.