In Re Jerome F. Valenta, Debtor. Jerome F. Valenta v. Donald W. Henry, Trustee Joseph Valenta, Trustee for Valenta Family Trust

Good Law
17 F.3d 398·1994 WL 41243·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 9687
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 199493-55030California431 words

Opinion

Opinion

17 F.3d 398 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Jerome F. VALENTA, Debtor. Jerome F. VALENTA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald W. HENRY, Trustee; Joseph Valenta, Trustee for Valenta Family Trust, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55030. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 7, 1994. * Decided Feb. 10, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jerome F. Valenta, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's denial of Valenta's motion for court-appointed counsel. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 3 Although neither party has addressed the question, "we are required to raise issues concerning our jurisdiction sua sponte." McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F.2d 1050, 1052 (9th Cir.1992). This court has jurisdiction over final orders of the district courts reviewing bankruptcy court decisions. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 158 (d); Security Pac. Bank Washington…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.