Tanis Developments International v. Millennium Pictures CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 19, 2022B314817California6,961 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/19/22 Tanis Developments International v. Millennium Pictures CA2/7

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

TANIS DEVELOPMENTS B314817

INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

(Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. 20STCV35794) v.

MILLENNIUM PICTURES INC.,

Defendant and Appellant;

NEIL MARSHALL,

Intervener and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Richard J. Burdge, Jr. Judge. Reversed and remanded with directions. Lavely & Singer, Martin D. Singer, Michael E. Weinsten and Allison S. Hart for Defendant and Appellant. Fagelbaum & Heller, Jerold Fagelbaum and Philip Heller for Tanis Developments International, Inc. and Neil Marshall.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.