United States v. Filemon Arzate-Nunez

Good Law
18 F.3d 730·94 Daily Journal DAR 2542·1994 WL 56484·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 3381·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1448
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 199493-30129California4,245 words

Opinion

Opinion

Goodwin, J.

Filemon Arzate-Nunez appeals his guilty plea conviction of being an alien in the United States after deportation and conviction of an aggravated felony. 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b)(2). He argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment and in accepting his conditional guilty plea. We affirm.

I. FACTS & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Arzate-Nunez is a citizen of Mexico who has spent significant time in the United States. In 1985, he was convicted in California state court of the sale or transportation of a narcotic, a felony under California Health & Safety Code § 11352. He served less than 90 days in jail. In January 1992, he was again arrested by officers investigating a drug conspiracy. The federal District Court of Washington, Eastern Division dismissed the charges arising out of this incident without prejudice. However, on April 4, 1992, the INS deported Arzate-Nunez based on his immigration status. Before his deportation, the INS sent Arzate-Nunez a warning letter stating that “any deported person who within five years returns without permission is guilty of a felony ... [and] may be punished by imprisonment of not more than two years and/or a fine of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.