Anthony J. English v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company

Good Law
18 F.3d 741·94 Daily Journal DAR 2969·1994 WL 65255·145 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2746·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 3955
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 7, 199492-36815California2,465 words

Opinion

Opinion

Goodwin, J.

Plaintiff Anthony J. English, a former employee of defendant Burlington Northern Railroad Company (“Burlington”), appeals a summary judgment for Burlington and the denial of his petition for judicial review of an order of Public Law Board No. 3408 (the “Board”) affirming English’s discharge from employment for off-duty misconduct. We affirm.

I.

Burlington discharged English from employment on July 15, 1985, following an off-duty incident in which he assaulted one Stewart, another Burlington employee, at Stewart’s home. After English was arraigned on criminal charges stemming from the same incident, Burlington held an investigative hearing. On the advice of his attorney in the criminal matter, English chose not to testify at Burlington’s hearing. After this hearing, Burlington discharged English. Subsequently, English pled guilty to misdemeanor assault.

English appealed his discharge to the Board, pursuant to the collective bargaining agreement between his union and Burlington. The union represented English before the Board, and the union representative told him he would not be allowed to testify at the hearing, nor could he provide additional arguments to those presented to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.