Leon Stevens v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.

Good Law
18 F.3d 1443·94 Daily Journal DAR 2483·145 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2668·40 Fed. R. Serv. 561·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 3263
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 199419-16102California3,560 words

Opinion

Opinion

18 F.3d 1443 145 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2668 , 127 Lab.Cas. P 11,043 Leon STEVENS; Jerry Carson; Nick Cotogno; Ralph Allen; Lauro Andrade, Jr.; Betty Armet; Dale Ball, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MOORE BUSINESS FORMS, INC., d/b/a Moore Business Forms & Systems Division; Local 404 M Graphic Communications International Union; Norman V. Salaets; Ray F. Ardanaz; Graham J. McClean, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55936. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 10, 1993. Decided Feb. 25, 1994. Dale M. Fiola, Anaheim, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants. William S. Waldo, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, Howard Z. Rosen, Posner & Rosen, Los Angeles, CA, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before: ALDISERT * , HUG, and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges. ALDISERT, Circuit Judge: 1 This appeal by union members from a district court order granting summary judgment in favor of their union and their employer requires us to examine the statutory duty of fair representation and Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act. We must determine whether the district court properly concluded…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.