Silber v. Mabon

Good Law
18 F.3d 1449·94 Daily Journal DAR 3366·28 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 680·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 4530·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1830
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 15, 199492-56004California3,764 words

Opinion

Opinion

18 F.3d 1449 62 USLW 2596 , Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,115 Joy SILBER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, Arthur P. Argyris, Class Member, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stuart P. MABON; Dundas I. Flaherty; Eugene F. Hovanec; Ericson M. Dustan; Edwin P. Heacox; and Micropolis Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-56004. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 3, 1994. Decided March 15, 1994. Lionel Z. Glancy, Santa Monica, CA, for plaintiff-appellant. Herbert E. Milstein, Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll, Washington, DC (argued), and Michael S. Glassman, Clemens, Glassman and Clemens, Los Angeles, CA (signed the briefs), for plaintiff-appellee Joy Silber. William J. Meeske and Jennifer Upham Saunders, Latham & Watkins, Los Angeles, CA, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before: SNEED, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. RYMER, Circuit Judge: 1 Arthur P. Argyris was an absent member of a securities class action whose stock in Micropolis Corporation was held in street name by PaineWebber, Inc., his broker. He did not receive notice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.