Golden Gate Hotel Association v. City and County of San Francisco and Brad Paul, Golden Gate Hotel Association v. City and County of San Francisco and Brad Paul, and Tenderloin Housing Clinic, Inc., Golden Gate Hotel Association v. City and County of San Francisco and Brad Paul, and North of Market Planning Coalition

Good Law
18 F.3d 1482·94 Daily Journal DAR 3544·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 5653·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1918
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 199493-16713California3,399 words

Opinion

Opinion

18 F.3d 1482 GOLDEN GATE HOTEL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and Brad Paul, Defendants-Appellants. GOLDEN GATE HOTEL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and Brad Paul, Defendants, and Tenderloin Housing Clinic, Inc., Defendant-Appellant. GOLDEN GATE HOTEL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and Brad Paul, Defendants, and North of Market Planning Coalition, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-16713, 93-16714, 93-16784. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 10, 1994. Decided March 18, 1994. Andrew W. Schwartz and George K.H. Schell, Deputy City Attys., San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellant. Timothy J. Lee, Tenderloin Housing Clinic, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellant. Douglas R. Young, Tamar Pachter, Farella, Braun & Martel, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellant. Violet Elizabeth Grayson, Grayson & Topsfield, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiff-appellee. John Blankenship, Montgomery, Purdue Blankenship & Austin, Seattle, WA; Paul D. Kamernar, Washington Legal Foundation, Washington, DC, for amicus. R.S. Radford, Pacific Legal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.