United States v. Rafael Villagomez-Troche

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 19, 202217-10540California619 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 19 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-10540

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:17-cr-00836-SPL-1 v. District of Arizona, Phoenix

RAFAEL VILLAGOMEZ-TROCHE, AKA

Robert Villagomez Troche, AKA Rafael MEMORANDUM* Villagomez-Troche, Jr.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven P. Logan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 9, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: WATFORD and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and ROBRENO,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. Page 2 of 4

Rafael Villagomez-Troche, a native…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.