United States v. Kathy Funtila

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 19, 202220-10441California320 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 19 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10441

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:17-cr-00515-LEK-1

v.

KATHY FUNTILA, AKA Kathy Retter, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Leslie E. Kobayashi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2022**

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Kathy Funtila appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying her

second motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand.

With respect to Funtila’s first motion for compassionate release, the district

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). court concluded that (1) Funtila had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.