Edward Ray, Jr. v. L. Parreno
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 19, 202219-17137California293 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 19 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr., No. 19-17137
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:19-cv-03086-EJD
v.
MEMORANDUM*
L. PARRENO,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward J. Davila, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 12, 2022**
Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Edward Vincent Ray, Jr. appeals pro se from the
district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to pay
the filing fee after denying Ray’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”).
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). court’s interpretation and application of 28 U.S.C.…