Ame Adaka v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

19 F.3d 25 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ame ADAKA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70769. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 7, 1994. * Decided Feb. 16, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ame Adaka, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") dismissal of his appeal of the immigration judge's order ("IJ") finding him deportable as an overstayed nonimmigrant and as an alien convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude, and denying his application for voluntary departure. 1 We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a), and we deny the petition for review. 3 * Detention, Bond, and Section 1252(i) 4 Adaka contends that the attorney general violated his rights by not instituting deportation proceedings expeditiously pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1252 (i). Adaka also claims that…