Ali T. Agha v. Secretary of the Army William T. McGivern Jr., U.S. Attorney, William F. Murphy, Assistant U.S. Attorney

19 F.3d 25 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ali T. AGHA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF the ARMY; William T. McGivern, Jr., U.S. Attorney, William F. Murphy, Assistant U.S. Attorney, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16883. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1994. * Decided Feb. 25, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ali T. Agha, a former instructor of Arabic at the Defense Language Institute (DLI) who brought employment discrimination actions against the Secretary of the Army based on the DLI's failure to rehire him, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), against the Secretary of the Army, the Assistant United States Attorney who represented the Secretary in the underlying actions, William F. Murphy, and former United States Attorney William T. McGivern, Jr., and individuals…