Edward E. Allen v. William E. Arnado, Josephine County Sheriff

19 F.3d 25 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edward E. ALLEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William E. ARNADO, Josephine County Sheriff, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-35146. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1994. * Decided March 3, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Edward Allen, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 petition for habeas corpus with prejudice. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, Thomas v. Lewis, 945 F.2d 1119, 1122 (9th Cir.1991), and affirm. 3 On June 1, 1991, Allen was sentenced to five years probation on four misdemeanor counts of issuing false financial statements with the requirement that he serve six months imprisonment on each of the four convictions. Allen was later found guilty of one felony charge of Aggravated Theft, and one felony charge of Aggravated Theft in the…