Ali T. Agha v. Secretary of Army, Ali T. Agha v. Secretary of the Army, Ali T. Agha v. Secretary of the Army

Good Law
19 F.3d 25
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 199492-16921California2,326 words

Opinion

Opinion

19 F.3d 25 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ali T. AGHA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF ARMY, Defendant-Appellee. Ali T. AGHA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF the ARMY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Ali T. AGHA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF the ARMY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 92-16921, 92-16923, 92-16924. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1994. * Decided Feb. 25, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In these consolidated appeals, Ali T. Agha appeals pro se the district court's judgment in favor of the Secretary of the Army, following a bench trial on Agha's claims alleging that the Defense Language Institue (DLI) discriminated against him because of his national origin, religion, age, and exercise of protected rights, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.