Calvin Charles v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary

19 F.3d 26 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Calvin CHARLES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Manfred MAASS, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-35233. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 8, 1994. * Decided March 11, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Oregon state prisoner Calvin Charles appeals the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Charles alleges that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction and that his counsel was ineffective. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Secs. 1291 , 2253. We affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's decision on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Adams v. Peterson, 968 F.2d 835, 843 (9th Cir.1992) (en banc), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1818 (1993). To the extent it is necessary to review the district court's factual findings, the clearly…