Ignacio Cobos v. Gordon Hunter Kenneth Kunes

19 F.3d 26 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ignacio COBOS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gordon HUNTER; Kenneth Kunes, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35294. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1994. * Decided March 3, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ingnacio Cobos, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Cobos contends that defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights by (a) exercising deliberate indifference to his medical needs; (b) engaging in excessive physical violence in restraining him and escorting him to isolation; and (c) transferring him to isolation in retaliation for his medical grievances. 1 In addition, Cobos contends that the district court abused its discretion by granting summary judgment to defendants without allowing him to complete his discovery. We have…