Robert R. Estrada v. James H. Gomez
Opinion
Opinion
19 F.3d 26 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert R. ESTRADA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James H. GOMEZ, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16000. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 8, 1994. * Decided March 10, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert R. Estrada, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order staying his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 civil rights action. In his complaint, Estrada claims that prison officials at Pelican Bay State Prison (Pelican Bay) are: (1) emitting a high frequency sound causing psychological trauma and stress; (2) denying Estrada adequate legal access; (3) conspiring to murder Estrada in retaliation for his civil rights litigation; (4) double-celling Estrada with violent gang members; and (5) failing to provide an educational program for inmates. Estrada is seeking declaratory, injunctive and monetary relief as well as a preliminary…