Gregory H. Bowers v. Bonneville Power Administration

Good Law
19 F.3d 26·1994 WL 96278·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 11185
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 22, 199492-70639California287 words

Opinion

Opinion

19 F.3d 26 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gregory H. BOWERS, Petitioner, v. BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. No. 92-70639. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 8, 1994. Decided March 22, 1994. 1 Before: BROWNING, KOZINSKI, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * 3 Bowers challenges Bonneville Power Administration's Puget Sound Area Electric Reliability Plan and the Environmental Impact Statement relating to that Plan. During oral argument, Bonneville advised the court that Bonneville has not made a decision to construct a cross-Cascades transmission line and the Impact Statement and Reliability Plan do not (1) authorize or commit Bonneville to construct a cross-Cascades transmission line now or in the future; (2) limit the contingency measures, order of priority or alternatives to be considered in the future to those identified in this Impact Statement and Reliability Plan; or (3) preclude consideration of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.