Roberto Calzada Cendejas v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
19 F.3d 26·1994 WL 96391·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 11186
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 24, 199493-70430California1,159 words

Opinion

Opinion

19 F.3d 26 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Roberto Calzada CENDEJAS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70430. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 23, 1994. * Decided March 24, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Roberto Calzada Cendejas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") dismissal of his appeal from the immigration judge's ("IJ") decision finding him deportable and denying his application for a waiver of deportation pursuant to section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("Act"), 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1182 (c). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a). We deny the petition for review. 3 On March 19, 1987, the Immigration and Naturalization Service ("INS") issued an order to show cause charging Cendejas with being deportable under section 241(a)(4) of the Act,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.