George R. Borrell, M.D. Joyce Willes Brown, AKA Joyce Welles Brown v. Robert A. Heron

Good Law
19 F.3d 26·1994 WL 65302·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 11170
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 2, 199493-55299California338 words

Opinion

Opinion

19 F.3d 26 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. George R. BORRELL, M.D.; Joyce Willes Brown, aka Joyce Welles Brown, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Robert A. HERON, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-55299. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 23, 1993. * Decided March 2, 1994. Before: SNEED, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Dr. George Borrell and Joyce Brown appeal the district court's dismissal of their action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1983 and 1985 alleging that Robert Heron, a deputy attorney general, violated their civil rights by prosecuting Borrell without probable cause and by depriving Brown of her right to privacy to obtain alternative medical treatment from Dr. Borrell. The district court held that Heron was absolutely immune from suit. This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. 3 Pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 4(a), a party has thirty days from entry of judgment in which to file a notice of appeal. In this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.