Federal Trade Commission v. Mark R. Crittenden, Etc., Federal Trade Commission, Alan S. Bercutt, C.P.A., Creditor-Appellant v. Mark R. Crittenden, George E. Schulman, Receiver-Appellee

19 F.3d 26 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark R. CRITTENDEN, etc., et al., Defendants-Appellants. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, Alan S. Bercutt, C.P.A., Creditor-Appellant, v. Mark R. CRITTENDEN, Defendant, George E. Schulman, Receiver-Appellee. Nos. 93-55243, 93-55471. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 2, 1994. Decided Feb. 25, 1994. 1 Before: TANG, PREGERSON and NOONAN, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * 3 Mark R. Crittenden (Crittenden) and Alan Bercutt (Bercutt) appeal the district court's Order Granting Receiver's Petition for Distribution. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 (a)(2) to review the Order of the district court. We affirm the district court's Order and dissolve the stay issued by this court August 13, 1993. BACKGROUND 4 In April, 1991, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) initiated proceedings against Crittenden, individually and doing…