Albert R. Garcia, Jr. v. Margaret A. Knapp A. Caito Nevada Board of State Prison Commissioners, State Political Subdivision

19 F.3d 27 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Albert R. GARCIA, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret A. KNAPP; A. Caito; Nevada Board of State Prison Commissioners, state political subdivision, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 92-15706, 92-15809. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1994. * Decided March 2, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Albert R. Garcia, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment and judgment following a bench trial in favor of the defendants, various Nevada state prison officials. Garcia contends that the defendants denied him access to the courts, in violation of his constitutional rights. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 We review de novo a district court's grant of summary judgment, Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1044 (9th Cir.1989). Summary judgment is appropriate if the evidence "show[s]…