Louis Ippolito v. Larry F. Taylor, Warden

19 F.3d 27 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Louis IPPOLITO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Larry F. TAYLOR, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-55301. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 8, 1994. * Decided March 9, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Federal prisoner Louis Ippolito appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Ippolito alleges that the United State Parole Commission ("the Commission") improperly set his parole date. Ippolito contends that the Commission: (1) incorrectly set his presumptive parole date by going above the recommended guidelines; and (2) failed to consider the disparity in release dates between him and his codefendant. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . 1 We affirm. 3 "Judgments involving a broad range of factors that the Commission takes into account in arriving at its decision…