Richard Allen Goudy v. Edward C. Williams, Sheriff Attorney General of the State of California San Luis Obispo County, District Attorney

19 F.3d 27 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard Allen GOUDY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Edward C. WILLIAMS, Sheriff; Attorney General of the State of California; San Luis Obispo County, District Attorney, Respondents-Appellees. No. 93-55985. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 8, 1994. * Decided March 9, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Goudy appeals the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which we review de novo. Harris v. Pulley, 885 F.2d 1354, 1370 (9th Cir.1988). We affirm. 3 Goudy was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol, a misdemeanor, and sentenced to 10 days in jail. On direct appeal, Goudy contended that statements he made to police while awaiting medical treatment in the hospital were involuntary. The Appellate Department of the Superior Court affirmed his conviction and declined to certify the case for review by the state…