Mujahid v. Nobriga

Good Law
19 F.3d 28·1994 WL 68266·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 11131
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 2, 199493-16246California587 words

Opinion

Opinion

19 F.3d 28 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sabil M. MUJAHID, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shelley NOBRIGA, Classification Coordinator; Richard Mello, Unit Manager; John Smythe, Administrator; Carol Hashimoto, Classification Officer, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16246. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1994. * Decided March 2, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Hawaii state prisoner Sabil M. Mujahid appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action claiming that prison officials violated his constitutional rights by failing to provide him with a timely six-month review of his security classification. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review the summary judgment de novo, Hutchinson v. United States, 838 F.2d 390, 392 (9th Cir.1988), and we affirm. 3 "A liberty interest may arise from the due…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.