Robert L. Pangburn, Jr. v. United States

19 F.3d 28 73 A.F.T.R.2d 94 -1439 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert L. PANGBURN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-16189. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1994. * Decided Feb. 28, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert L. Pangburn, Jr. appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for the United States in Pangburn's 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2410 quiet title action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's summary judgment. Hughes v. United States, 953 F.2d 531, 541 (9th Cir.1992). "We must determine, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court correctly applied the relevant substantive law." Id. 4 In the action below, Pangburn challenged the validity of…