Marcos Arcenio Ramirez-Ramirez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
19 F.3d 28·1994 WL 83250·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 11139
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 199493-70647California710 words

Opinion

Opinion

19 F.3d 28 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Marcos Arcenio RAMIREZ-RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70647. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 8, 1994. * Decided March 10, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ramirez appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) summary dismissal of his appeal from an order of deportation. We affirm. 3 Ramirez is a citizen of El Salvador. In April 1992, he entered the United States without inspection, in violation of 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 (a)(1)(B). At a deportation hearing in May 1992, he conceded the charge of deportability, but applied for political asylum. The Immigration Judge (IJ) scheduled a hearing for September 1992, to decide the merits of his application. Ramirez failed to appear at that hearing. 1 4 The IJ rescheduled the hearing only because he did not have the State Department's reply to Ramirez'…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.