Ignacio A. Navarrete v. City and County of San Francisco, Wilfred Wong Milton Gee San Francisco Public Utilities

19 F.3d 28 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ignacio A. NAVARRETE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Wilfred Wong; Milton Gee; San Francisco Public Utilities, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15803. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1994. ** Decided Feb. 28, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Ignacio A. Navarrete appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for the City and County of San Francisco ("City") in his employment discrimination action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e, et seq. Navarrete contends that he was terminated from his job as an automotive mechanic for the City's Municipal Railway ("Muni") because he is Hispanic. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo a district court's grant of summary judgment. Lindahl v. Air France, 930 F.2d 1434, 1436 (9th Cir.1991).…