Alisi Numia Nolan v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

19 F.3d 28 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alisi Numia NOLAN, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70509. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 17, 1993. * Decided Feb. 15, 1994. 1 Before: SKOPIL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Alisi Manupule (formerly Alisi Nolan) petitions for review of a July 7, 1992 order issued by the Honolulu District Director of Immigration denying a further extension of time in which to depart the United States voluntarily, and a March 13, 1986 decision of the INS district director rescinding her status as a lawful permanent resident. This court lacks jurisdiction to review either of these decisions, and we therefore dismiss Manupule's petition. 4 * Manupule first argues that she was entitled to receive personal notice of the INS's intent to revoke her permanent resident status and that since she did not receive notice, she was denied due process…