Sean T. Morin v. Allane Tandy Clyde Armstrong Sam Cannon Kurt S. Peterson Lt. Fitzgerald

19 F.3d 28 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sean T. MORIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Allane TANDY; Clyde Armstrong; Sam Cannon; Kurt S. Peterson; Lt. Fitzgerald, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35605. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 22, 1994. * Decided March 2, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Sean Morin, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of prison official defendants in Morin's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Morin alleged that his due process rights were violated at a prison disciplinary hearing. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review the district court's summary judgment de novo. Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct. 3217 (1990), and we reverse and remand. 3 An inmate facing disciplinary charges is entitled to: written advance notice…