Morgovsky v. Creditors' Collection Service of San Francisco

19 F.3d 28 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Naum MORGOVSKY and Irina Morgovsky, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CREDITORS' COLLECTION SERVICE OF SAN FRANCISCO dba Premium Collection Service, a Corp.; Mark Love, individually and as President of Premium Collection Service et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16563. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1993. * Filed Nov. 29, 1993. Withdrawn and Decided Feb. 15, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The appellees' petition for rehearing is granted in part. The memorandum disposition filed on November 29, 1993 in the above matter is hereby withdrawn. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Naum and Irina Morgovsky appeal pro se the district court's dismissal of their amended complaint alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1692 (e), and the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681q. The Morgovskys argue that the…